Oates v Emerson Essay

In class out of the trine essays we read I choose to do a compare-contrast between Ralph Waldo Emersons and Joyce Carol Oatess essays. I choose these two beca theatrical role they both had antithetic feels towards nature. Oates is against nature and Emerson is about becoming one with nature. Even though both have different meaning, both Oates and Emerson productively uses rhetorical strategies such as challenge to credibility, emotion, and logical systemal system to support their claims on nature. In Emersons From Nature he uses credibility when he refers to god. He states that I become a transparent eyeball I am nothingI am activate or particle of God. Emerson is basically saying that he is one with nature. He is persuading the reader to think this. Emerson relates to his audience through the feelings that nature by its self can inspire. In Oates Against Nature she uses credibility at the very beginning of her essay by stating, I was lying on my back in the dirtstaring up a t the skyBy this statement you get an image in your doubt of whats occurring. Oates uses credibility again in her essay when referring to Edmund of King Lear. In both of their essays, Emerson and Oates effectively use credibility to support their claims. In Oates essay she uses emotion when mentioning something quite gruesome. She states the raccoontearing at his take in belly with his teeth, so that his intestines spill out Another example is when she mentions that she has paroxysmal tachycardia and that it just so happens to be fatal. You cannot help provided to feel bad for her. Is this the reason she doesnt enjoy nature since her full term can attack so unexpectedly? In Emersons essay he uses emotion when states that but noneowns the landscape. He is saying that anyone can enjoy nature. Next he says that In the woods, is uninterrupted youth.This is emotion because Emerson mentions childhood, and this is something that people remember. He has felt that he has been changed by nature, and that you should to. Both essays use logic in order to support their position on nature. Oates uses logic in her essay when stating the dangers of her medical condition. She mentions why its fatal by reason, and that the most important thing you can do with tachycardia is that you must proscribepanic. She with this statement also includes statistics on the amounts of heartbeats it takes for the condition to be fatal. Another example is when Oates refers poems of writers such as Flowers and Fruit by Colette and Taking the Side of Things by Ponge. Now in Emersons he uses the appeal of logic when he convinces his reader that we have no questionsare unanswerable.This statement is reasoning that nature will answer all questions. He proves that nature is greater than man, and that it deserves respect. To conclude, both Oates and Emerson effectively use the appeals of credibility, emotion, and logic to support their position when it comes to nature. They both are complete oppos ites when it comes to nature. Emerson feels that nature is not only beautiful, but that it holds something different for everyone. Oates on the opposing side dismisses nature and all its glory. Oates has her view against nature and Emersons essay is successful in uncovering truths about nature and mans role in nature.